Objectivity Discourse, the Protestant Secular, and the Decolonization of Religious Studies
This article documents a complex genealogy of objectivity discourse that has shaped the study of religion in the modern academy. Analyzing data derived from a 2015 survey administered to Big 10, Research 1, and Ivy League religious studies institutions in the United States, the study posits a provis...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| En: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Año: 2019, Volumen: 31, Número: 4/5, Páginas: 376-415 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
USA
/ Universidad
/ Ciencias de la religión
/ Protestantismo
/ Secularismo
/ Objetividad
/ Discurso
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AA Ciencias de la religión AB Filosofía de la religión KBQ América del Norte KDD Iglesia evangélica |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
the Protestant secular
B Pluralism B Religious Studies B the state B objectivity discourse B Hegemony B Identity |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | This article documents a complex genealogy of objectivity discourse that has shaped the study of religion in the modern academy. Analyzing data derived from a 2015 survey administered to Big 10, Research 1, and Ivy League religious studies institutions in the United States, the study posits a provisional taxonomy of neutrality language. The debates about positionality and self-disclosure in religion classrooms, as explored in the taxonomy, is evidence of the pervasive epistemic framework of the "Protestant secular." The article proposes that religious studies, as a hybrid discipline, may address the status of the academy as an agent of the secular state by acknowledging its complicity in regimes of power and engaging in the rigorously critical, robustly ethnographic, and concertedly reflexive study of its own institutions and practices. Rather than removing objectivity discourse from religious studies, the article concludes by arguing for retaining a modified form of objectivist realism as a productive, decolonized ideal. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341463 |