Ideological Blindspot in the Academic Study of Religion and Film

This essay offers a critique of how "religion" is defined and studied in the academic field of religion and film, and calls for a more nuanced application of ideological analysis to the subject. Surveying the dominant scholarship in the field, it exposes a tendency to provide either theolo...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Eaghll, Tenzan (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill [2019]
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2019, 卷: 31, 發布: 4/5, Pages: 416-445
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 宗教學 / 電影 / 宗教 / 意識形態
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AG Religious life; material religion
Further subjects:B Sui Generis
B film studies
B Critique
B 電影
B Ideology
B 宗教
在線閱讀: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
實物特徵
總結:This essay offers a critique of how "religion" is defined and studied in the academic field of religion and film, and calls for a more nuanced application of ideological analysis to the subject. Surveying the dominant scholarship in the field, it exposes a tendency to provide either theological or mythological definitions of religion and to privilege the category as something sui generis—a unique, special, or "spiritual" domain of things in the world. Moreover, it shows how this scholarship disparages ideological analysis as reductive, abstract, and elite, and fails to consider how religion itself functions ideologically in film and film criticism. Drawing upon the work of critical scholars of religion to support this latter claim, as well as contemporary film studies theory, the article closes with a call for a more nuanced understanding of how ideology is constructed at both an individual and cinematic level.
ISSN:1570-0682
Contains:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341465