Ideological Blindspot in the Academic Study of Religion and Film

This essay offers a critique of how "religion" is defined and studied in the academic field of religion and film, and calls for a more nuanced application of ideological analysis to the subject. Surveying the dominant scholarship in the field, it exposes a tendency to provide either theolo...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Eaghll, Tenzan (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Brill [2019]
В: Method & theory in the study of religion
Год: 2019, Том: 31, Выпуск: 4/5, Страницы: 416-445
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Религиоведение / Фильм (мотив) / Религия / Идеология
Индексация IxTheo:AA Религиоведение
AD Социология религии
AG Религиозная жизнь
Другие ключевые слова:B Sui Generis
B Фильм (мотив)
B film studies
B Critique
B Ideology
B Религия
Online-ссылка: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Описание
Итог:This essay offers a critique of how "religion" is defined and studied in the academic field of religion and film, and calls for a more nuanced application of ideological analysis to the subject. Surveying the dominant scholarship in the field, it exposes a tendency to provide either theological or mythological definitions of religion and to privilege the category as something sui generis—a unique, special, or "spiritual" domain of things in the world. Moreover, it shows how this scholarship disparages ideological analysis as reductive, abstract, and elite, and fails to consider how religion itself functions ideologically in film and film criticism. Drawing upon the work of critical scholars of religion to support this latter claim, as well as contemporary film studies theory, the article closes with a call for a more nuanced understanding of how ideology is constructed at both an individual and cinematic level.
ISSN:1570-0682
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341465