Eusebius of Caesarea's or Eusebius of Emesa's "Theophania"? Evidence from the Lemmata in "Vaticanus Graecus" 1611
This paper is a response to Alice Whealey's proposal concerning the authorship of certain fragments traditionally assigned to Eusebius of Caesarea, arguing that they are more likely the work of his pupil, Eusebius of Emesa. The paper considers the manuscript evidence, specifically the lemmata i...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| In: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Jahr: 2019, Band: 73, Heft: 5, Seiten: 507-515 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Eusebius of Caesarea
B Nicetas of Heraclea B Eusebius of Emesa |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper is a response to Alice Whealey's proposal concerning the authorship of certain fragments traditionally assigned to Eusebius of Caesarea, arguing that they are more likely the work of his pupil, Eusebius of Emesa. The paper considers the manuscript evidence, specifically the lemmata in Vat.gr. 1611, in relation to the internal evidence considered by Whealey. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341398 |