Die Wendung im theologischen Denken Karl Barths zu Beginn des Ersten Weltkriegs
The outbreak of World War I prompted Karl Barth to abandon step-by-step essential points of the liberal theological credo he had held on to until that time. Seeing that his liberal theological teachers in Germany favoured a "war theology", which was no longer "liberal" but rather...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Γερμανικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2019]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 65, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 202-232 |
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Κήρυξη πολέμου
/ Παγκόσμιος Πόλεμος (1914-1918, μοτίβο)
/ Φιλελεύθερη θεολογία
/ Διαλεκτική θεολογία
/ Πίστη (μοτίβο)
|
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | CG Χριστιανισμός και Πολιτική KAJ Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1914-, Σύγχρονη Εποχή KDD Ευαγγελική Εκκλησία NBA Δογματική |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | The outbreak of World War I prompted Karl Barth to abandon step-by-step essential points of the liberal theological credo he had held on to until that time. Seeing that his liberal theological teachers in Germany favoured a "war theology", which was no longer "liberal" but rather atavistic, Barth questioned the truth of liberal theology because it did not have the strength in a crisis to continue to hold its supporters. He came to a concept of faith instead of experience ("Erlebnis"), namely, faith in the divine authority and perspicuity of the Bible, in Christ, who is God and man and has by his death and his resurrection redeemed humankind. The diastasis between God and man, whose sinfulness has been revealed by the war, is so great that only the incarnation of God’s word can overcome it. Barth did not resist being designated "orthodox" because of this shift. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2019.65.3.202 |