Metaphor in argument: The Beelzebul-controversy in the Gospel according to Mark
How do metaphoric texts interact with their argumentative context? After explaining the use and functioning of metaphors in communicative acts, the essay focusses on similes and parables as extended metaphors. Mark 3:22-30 is studied in detail, examining the function of the metaphors used in the arg...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
[2019]
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft
Year: 2019, Volume: 110, Issue: 2, Pages: 133-145 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Markusevangelium 3,22-30
/ Metaphor
/ Parable
/ Argumantation
/ Beelzebul, Demon
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture HC New Testament NBH Angelology; demonology |
| Further subjects: | B
Holy Spirit
B Lord of the House B Argument B Jesus B Beelzebul B Simile B Parable B Temptation B Mark 3:22-30 B Satan B Metaphor |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |