Reason with Baggage
In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewi...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2019, 卷: 47, 發布: 4, Pages: 696-715 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Novak, David 1941-
/ 猶太教
/ 自然法
/ 基督教
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism BH Judaism CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations |
| Further subjects: | B
David Novak
B Theology B Jewish-Christian dialogue B Natural Law B Metaphysics |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewish thought and practice that admit of the same three parts. As a result of this interpretation, I posit that Paul Nahme, who argues for a pragmatic reading of Novak's theory, as well as Martin Kavka and Randi Rashkover, who offer a political understanding of it, do not account for the theological richness and metaphysical basis of Novak's natural law theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12287 |