Following the blueprint I: Niccacci's Biblical Hebrew syntax in view of Harald Weinrich's Tempus
Alviero Niccacci proposed a Biblical Hebrew syntax based on Harald Weinrich's text-linguistic framework. I argue Niccacci's methodology deviates substantially from Weinrich's proposition. This article critiques Niccacci's theoretical assumptions about the oppositions between fore...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Sage
[2020]
|
Dans: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Année: 2020, Volume: 44, Numéro: 3, Pages: 337-356 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Commentaire
/ Récit
/ Niccacci, Alviero 1940-2018
/ Weinrich, Harald 1927-2022
/ Discours (linguistique)
/ Linguistique textuelle
/ Polotsky, Hans Jakob 1905-1991
B Hébreu |
Classifications IxTheo: | HB Ancien Testament |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Discourse Analysis
B Comment-narrative B Harald Weinrich B text-linguistics B foreground-background B zero-degree |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Alviero Niccacci proposed a Biblical Hebrew syntax based on Harald Weinrich's text-linguistic framework. I argue Niccacci's methodology deviates substantially from Weinrich's proposition. This article critiques Niccacci's theoretical assumptions about the oppositions between foreground and background and that of comment and narrative. While considering these issues in view of Weinrich's method, I also suggest that the alternative source of inspiration for Niccacci was the work of Hans J. Polotsky. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089219862825 |