What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Critical research on religion
Anno: 2020, Volume: 8, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 73-86 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ Scienze religiose
/ Critica alla religione
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AA Scienze religiose AB Filosofia delle religioni |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
| Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Verlag) |
| Riepilogo: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |