What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| В: |
Critical research on religion
Год: 2020, Том: 8, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 73-86 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ Религиоведение
/ Критика религии
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AA Религиоведение AB Философия религии |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |