What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Critical research on religion
Year: 2020, 卷: 8, 发布: 1, Pages: 73-86 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ 宗教学
/ 宗教批判
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Further subjects: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
| 在线阅读: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| 总结: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |