What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| Em: |
Critical research on religion
Ano: 2020, Volume: 8, Número: 1, Páginas: 73-86 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ Ciências da religião
/ Crítica da religião
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AA Ciências da religião AB Filosofia da religião |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
| Acesso em linha: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Resumo: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |