Heterodox Hegels: heresiology in de Lubac and Bulgakov
This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac&...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
Em: |
Scottish journal of theology
Ano: 2020, Volume: 73, Número: 1, Páginas: 31-42 |
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Recepção
/ Bulgakov, Sergej Nikolaevič 1871-1944
/ Lubac, Henri de 1896-1991
/ Crítica
/ Heresia
/ Joaquimitas
|
Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Henri de Lubac
B G. W. F. Hegel B heresiology B Sergius Bulgakov |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Resumo: | This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac's heresiological critique has proven more influential, I commend Bulgakov's. The paper concludes by querying the very strategy of assaying philosophers like Hegel heresiologically. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061900070X |