The Geist of Hegel Past and Present
This essay appreciates Taylor’s qualitative (rather than quantitative) approach to secularization, which has revolutionized recent discussions of this topic. Taylor’s earlier work on Hegel provides a context for interpreting his proposal in A Secular Age that Western societies are secularly religiou...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Pneuma
Year: 2018, Volume: 40, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 58-70 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CA Christianity KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBC Doctrine of God NBF Christology VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Secularity
secularization
Charles Taylor
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (G.W.F.) Hegel
incarnation
Christology
deism
transcendence
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | This essay appreciates Taylor’s qualitative (rather than quantitative) approach to secularization, which has revolutionized recent discussions of this topic. Taylor’s earlier work on Hegel provides a context for interpreting his proposal in A Secular Age that Western societies are secularly religious or religiously secular—neither devoid of concern with transcendence, nor committed to theologically definite accounts of transcendence. Two major points of critique follow—first, that Hegelianism with its “immanent frame” excludes a distinctive Christian claim regarding Jesus’s incarnation; and, second, that Taylor’s hypothesis of faith “fragilized” by the “revisability” of contemporary religion needs empirical support to be fully credible. Taylor often represents religion as a lowest-common-denominator aspiration for something higher, rather than God coming to us incarnationally (John 1:14). Deism-with-transcendence is not Christianity. Taylor’s “fragilization” theory might mean that secularity, too, is “fragilized,” and it ought to provoke pastoral reflection on how “fragilized” faith might be stabilized. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0747 |
| Contains: | In: Pneuma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700747-04001034 |