The Geist of Hegel Past and Present
This essay appreciates Taylor’s qualitative (rather than quantitative) approach to secularization, which has revolutionized recent discussions of this topic. Taylor’s earlier work on Hegel provides a context for interpreting his proposal in A Secular Age that Western societies are secularly religiou...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill
2018
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Pneuma
Έτος: 2018, Τόμος: 40, Τεύχος: 1/2, Σελίδες: 58-70 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | CΑ Χριστιανισμός KAH Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1648-1913, Νεότερη Εποχή KAJ Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1914-, Σύγχρονη Εποχή NBC Δόγμα του Θεού NBF Χριστολογία VA Φιλοσοφία |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Secularity
secularization
Charles Taylor
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (G.W.F.) Hegel
incarnation
Christology
deism
transcendence
|
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (Verlag) |
| Σύνοψη: | This essay appreciates Taylor’s qualitative (rather than quantitative) approach to secularization, which has revolutionized recent discussions of this topic. Taylor’s earlier work on Hegel provides a context for interpreting his proposal in A Secular Age that Western societies are secularly religious or religiously secular—neither devoid of concern with transcendence, nor committed to theologically definite accounts of transcendence. Two major points of critique follow—first, that Hegelianism with its “immanent frame” excludes a distinctive Christian claim regarding Jesus’s incarnation; and, second, that Taylor’s hypothesis of faith “fragilized” by the “revisability” of contemporary religion needs empirical support to be fully credible. Taylor often represents religion as a lowest-common-denominator aspiration for something higher, rather than God coming to us incarnationally (John 1:14). Deism-with-transcendence is not Christianity. Taylor’s “fragilization” theory might mean that secularity, too, is “fragilized,” and it ought to provoke pastoral reflection on how “fragilized” faith might be stabilized. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0747 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | In: Pneuma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700747-04001034 |