Heterodox Hegels: heresiology in de Lubac and Bulgakov

This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's ‘heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac&...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Coyle, Justin Shaun (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Cambridge Univ. Press [2020]
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2020, 卷: 73, 发布: 1, Pages: 31-42
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831 / 接受 / Bulgakov, Sergej Nikolaevič 1871-1944 / Lubac, Henri de 1896-1991 / 批评 / 异端 / 约雅斤主义
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
Further subjects:B Henri de Lubac
B G. W. F. Hegel
B heresiology
B Sergius Bulgakov
在线阅读: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
实物特征
总结:This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's ‘heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac's heresiological critique has proven more influential, I commend Bulgakov's. The paper concludes by querying the very strategy of assaying philosophers like Hegel heresiologically.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contains:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S003693061900070X