Totus Christus: A Proposal for Protestant Christology and Ecclesiology
This article argues that Reformed catholics' should accept Augustine's totus Christus Christological-ecclesiology. It states what Augustine said about the doctrine. Then it responds to five Protestant objections to Augustine's doctrine, examining similar iterations in the theology of...
Autres titres: | Symposium: Totus Christus |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Collaborateurs: | ; ; |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Sage Publishing
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Pro ecclesia
Année: 2020, Volume: 29, Numéro: 1, Pages: 3-30 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430
/ Ecclésiologie
/ Christologie
/ Théologie protestante
|
Classifications IxTheo: | FA Théologie KAB Christianisme primitif KDD Église protestante NBF Christologie NBN Ecclésiologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Augustine
B Karl Barth B Totus Christus B Ecclesiology B Reformed catholicity B Vatican II B Hans Urs Von Balthasar B Westminster Confession of Faith |
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | This article argues that Reformed catholics' should accept Augustine's totus Christus Christological-ecclesiology. It states what Augustine said about the doctrine. Then it responds to five Protestant objections to Augustine's doctrine, examining similar iterations in the theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar and Karl Barth. Finally, it describes what totus Christus entails and does not entail, and concludes that Protestants should accept it because it is based in Scripture and does not entail all the deleterious things the objections claim it does. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2631-8334 |
Référence: | Kritik in "Hocus Totus (2019)"
Kritik in "Affirming Moser's Well-Qualified Totus Christus (2019)" Kritik in "Totus Christus and Praying the Psalms (2019)" |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Pro ecclesia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1063851219891630 |