Hocus Totus: The Elusive Wholeness of Christ
This article responds to David Moser's essay commending the Totus Christus to Protestants who wish to be biblical, identify with the catholic tradition, and speak truly about the Church. The article recognizes the Totus Christus as an important case study of the relationship between Christology...
| Outros títulos: | Symposium: Totus Christus |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage Publishing
[2019]
|
| Em: |
Pro ecclesia
Ano: 2020, Volume: 29, Número: 1, Páginas: 31-42 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Cristologia
/ Eclesiologia
/ Corpo de Cristo
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | NBF Cristologia NBN Eclesiologia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Augustine
B Mystical body B Mystical Union B Totus Christus B Ecclesiology B body of Christ |
| Acesso em linha: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | This article responds to David Moser's essay commending the Totus Christus to Protestants who wish to be biblical, identify with the catholic tradition, and speak truly about the Church. The article recognizes the Totus Christus as an important case study of the relationship between Christology and ecclesiology. The article evaluates Moser's case in three movements: first, by examining the way in which biblical language of Christ as the "head" of the Church "body" has been interpreted by Augustine and others; second, by comparing and contrasting the Reformed (soteriological) emphasis on mystical union with the Roman (ecclesiological) emphasis on mystical body; third, by examining the metaphysics of the Totus Christus and, in particular, the conceptual coherence of claiming that the Totus Christus designates a "united person" with "two subjects" that are "distinct in their being." The article concludes by asking about the practical consequences of accepting the Totus Christus, and by noting that the Totus Christus never did receive the necessary creedal support commensurate with catholic doctrine. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2631-8334 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Totus Christus (2019)"
Kritik in "Corpus Mysticum (2019)" |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Pro ecclesia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1063851219891610 |