Totus Christus: A Proposal for Protestant Christology and Ecclesiology
This article argues that Reformed catholics' should accept Augustine's totus Christus Christological-ecclesiology. It states what Augustine said about the doctrine. Then it responds to five Protestant objections to Augustine's doctrine, examining similar iterations in the theology of...
Subtitles: | Symposium: Totus Christus |
---|---|
主要作者: | |
其他作者: | ; ; |
格式: | 電子 Article |
語言: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
出版: |
Sage Publishing
[2019]
|
In: |
Pro ecclesia
Year: 2020, 卷: 29, 發布: 1, Pages: 3-30 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Augustinus, Aurelius, 聖人 354-430
/ 教會論
/ 基督論
/ 新教神學
|
IxTheo Classification: | FA Theology KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KDD Protestant Church NBF Christology NBN Ecclesiology |
Further subjects: | B
Augustine
B Karl Barth B Totus Christus B Ecclesiology B Reformed catholicity B Vatican II B Hans Urs Von Balthasar B Westminster Confession of Faith |
在線閱讀: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
總結: | This article argues that Reformed catholics' should accept Augustine's totus Christus Christological-ecclesiology. It states what Augustine said about the doctrine. Then it responds to five Protestant objections to Augustine's doctrine, examining similar iterations in the theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar and Karl Barth. Finally, it describes what totus Christus entails and does not entail, and concludes that Protestants should accept it because it is based in Scripture and does not entail all the deleterious things the objections claim it does. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2631-8334 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Hocus Totus (2019)"
Kritik in "Affirming Moser's Well-Qualified Totus Christus (2019)" Kritik in "Totus Christus and Praying the Psalms (2019)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Pro ecclesia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1063851219891630 |