Totus Christus: A Proposal for Protestant Christology and Ecclesiology

This article argues that ‘Reformed catholics' should accept Augustine's totus Christus Christological-ecclesiology. It states what Augustine said about the doctrine. Then it responds to five Protestant objections to Augustine's doctrine, examining similar iterations in the theology of...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
Subtitles:Symposium: Totus Christus
主要作者: Moser, J. David (Author)
其他作者: Vanhoozer, Kevin J. 1957- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Horton, Michael Scott 1964- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Allen, R. Michael 1981- (Bibliographic antecedent)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Sage Publishing [2019]
In: Pro ecclesia
Year: 2020, 卷: 29, 发布: 1, Pages: 3-30
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Augustinus, Aurelius, 圣人 354-430 / 教会论 / 基督论 / 新教神学
IxTheo Classification:FA Theology
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KDD Protestant Church
NBF Christology
NBN Ecclesiology
Further subjects:B Augustine
B Karl Barth
B Totus Christus
B Ecclesiology
B Reformed catholicity
B Vatican II
B Hans Urs Von Balthasar
B Westminster Confession of Faith
在线阅读: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
实物特征
总结:This article argues that ‘Reformed catholics' should accept Augustine's totus Christus Christological-ecclesiology. It states what Augustine said about the doctrine. Then it responds to five Protestant objections to Augustine's doctrine, examining similar iterations in the theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar and Karl Barth. Finally, it describes what totus Christus entails and does not entail, and concludes that Protestants should accept it because it is based in Scripture and does not entail all the deleterious things the objections claim it does.
ISSN:2631-8334
Reference:Kritik in "Hocus Totus (2019)"
Kritik in "Affirming Moser's Well-Qualified Totus Christus (2019)"
Kritik in "Totus Christus and Praying the Psalms (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Pro ecclesia
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/1063851219891630