Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
[2020]
|
En: |
TheoLogica
Año: 2020, Volumen: 4, Número: 2, Páginas: 87-101 |
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | NBC Dios NBF Cristología |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Subordination
B Analytic Theology B Trinity B Eternal Generation |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Sumario: | In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Is Subordinationism a Heresy? (2020)"
|
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323 |