Trinity, Subordination, and Heresy: A Reply to Mark Edwards

In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mullins, R. T. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Edwards, Mark 1962- (Antecedente bibliográfico)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain [2020]
En: TheoLogica
Año: 2020, Volumen: 4, Número: 2, Páginas: 87-101
Clasificaciones IxTheo:NBC Dios
NBF Cristología
Otras palabras clave:B Subordination
B Analytic Theology
B Trinity
B Eternal Generation
Acceso en línea: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Descripción
Sumario:In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father.
ISSN:2593-0265
Reference:Kritik von "Is Subordinationism a Heresy? (2020)"
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323