Bonhoeffer, status confessionis, and the Lutheran tradition
It has frequently been suggested that Bonhoeffer's resistance did not draw substantively from his own Lutheran theological tradition. Nonetheless, his reliance on the Lutheran tradition's resistance resources is evident in his use of the phrase status confessionis. The phrase is a hallmark...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Stellenbosch University
[2017]
|
En: |
Stellenbosch theological journal
Año: 2017, Volumen: 3, Número: 2, Páginas: 41-60 |
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | KAG Reforma KAJ Época contemporánea KDD Iglesia evangélica NBA Dogmática |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Resistance
B Formula of Concord B Bonhoeffer B Adiáfora B Status confessionis |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Sumario: | It has frequently been suggested that Bonhoeffer's resistance did not draw substantively from his own Lutheran theological tradition. Nonetheless, his reliance on the Lutheran tradition's resistance resources is evident in his use of the phrase status confessionis. The phrase is a hallmark of the gnesio-Lutheran position in the sixteenth-century intra-Lutheran adiaphora controversy, the position authoritatively endorsed in the Formula of Concord. Bonhoeffer demonstrably knew this tradition of Lutheranism and in the early Church Struggle deployed the idea of status confessionis in a way that was faithful to it. Because status confessionis arguably more than any other term conveys the theological reasoning of his early resistance activity, this alone merits the conclusion that Bonhoeffer's resistance drew substantively from the Lutheran tradition. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2413-9467 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17570/stj.2017.v3n2.a02 |