Bonhoeffer, status confessionis, and the Lutheran tradition

It has frequently been suggested that Bonhoeffer's resistance did not draw substantively from his own Lutheran theological tradition. Nonetheless, his reliance on the Lutheran tradition's resistance resources is evident in his use of the phrase status confessionis. The phrase is a hallmark...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: DeJonge, Michael P. 1978- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Stellenbosch University [2017]
En: Stellenbosch theological journal
Año: 2017, Volumen: 3, Número: 2, Páginas: 41-60
Clasificaciones IxTheo:KAG Reforma
KAJ Época contemporánea
KDD Iglesia evangélica 
NBA Dogmática
Otras palabras clave:B Resistance
B Formula of Concord
B Bonhoeffer
B Adiáfora
B Status confessionis
Acceso en línea: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Descripción
Sumario:It has frequently been suggested that Bonhoeffer's resistance did not draw substantively from his own Lutheran theological tradition. Nonetheless, his reliance on the Lutheran tradition's resistance resources is evident in his use of the phrase status confessionis. The phrase is a hallmark of the gnesio-Lutheran position in the sixteenth-century intra-Lutheran adiaphora controversy, the position authoritatively endorsed in the Formula of Concord. Bonhoeffer demonstrably knew this tradition of Lutheranism and in the early Church Struggle deployed the idea of status confessionis in a way that was faithful to it. Because status confessionis arguably more than any other term conveys the theological reasoning of his early resistance activity, this alone merits the conclusion that Bonhoeffer's resistance drew substantively from the Lutheran tradition.
ISSN:2413-9467
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17570/stj.2017.v3n2.a02