The Post-Resurrection Appearances of Jesus as Bereavement Experiences: An Engagement with Gerald O'Collins

In recent years, debate has resumed regarding whether or not the post-resurrection appearances may have been hallucinations or delusions on the part of the disciples. A sub-category of this debate is the question of bereavement hallucinations. Was the disciples' bereaved state in the wake of th...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Smith, Stephen Harry 1951- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage [2020]
Dans: Irish theological quarterly
Année: 2020, Volume: 85, Numéro: 2, Pages: 109-126
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B O'Collins, Gerald 1931- / Résurrection de Jésus / Apparition / Deuil / Hallucination
Classifications IxTheo:KDB Église catholique romaine
NBE Anthropologie
NBF Christologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Bereavement
B O'Collins
B Delusions
B Rees
B Hallucinations
B Parapsychology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:In recent years, debate has resumed regarding whether or not the post-resurrection appearances may have been hallucinations or delusions on the part of the disciples. A sub-category of this debate is the question of bereavement hallucinations. Was the disciples' bereaved state in the wake of the crucifixion responsible for their ‘seeing' Jesus? A few years ago, Gerald O'Collins, in this journal, argued, on the basis of a comparison between the two, that, despite a few similarities, the differences between them are too great to justify the so-called ‘hallucination hypothesis.' The question remains problematic, however, partly because biblical scholars do not take the contributions of professional psychologists and psychiatrists seriously enough. In the present article I examine O'Collins's arguments, reaching a different, though undogmatic conclusion from his own.
ISSN:1752-4989
Contient:Enthalten in: Irish theological quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0021140020906915