The Argument against Attributing Slogans in 1 Corinthians 6:12-20
While many scholars consider that Corinthian slogans are present in 1 Cor 6:12-20, this article argues that the attribution of slogans there is an unnecessary exegetical move based on unconvincing arguments. A reading of the pericope will be presented to demonstrate that slogans are unnecessary to m...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Eisenbrauns
[2018]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
Year: 2018, Volume: 8, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 147-166 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Corinthians 1. 6,12-20
/ Slogans
/ Sexuality
/ Ethics
/ Paul Apostle
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Sexual ethics
B Bible. Corinthians 1. 6,12-20 B 1 Corinthians B Slogans B Sin B Freedom B Eschatology |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | While many scholars consider that Corinthian slogans are present in 1 Cor 6:12-20, this article argues that the attribution of slogans there is an unnecessary exegetical move based on unconvincing arguments. A reading of the pericope will be presented to demonstrate that slogans are unnecessary to make sense of Paul's paraenesis. The arguments for and against each particular slogan will be evaluated. This study both consolidates the minority view held by Brian Dodd (1995) and David Garland (2003) and responds to Joseph Fitzmyer (2007) and Jerome Murphy O'Connor's (2009) criticisms of the same. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2576-7941 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.8.1-2.0147 |