Following the blueprint II: A new Biblical Hebrew syntactic outline derived from Harald Weinrich
Following my critique of Niccacci’s methodological stances, I establish a new interpretation of Biblical Hebrew word order derived from Harald Weinrich’s Tempus. Its word order mirrors the opposition between comment and narrative registers. I describe the reasons for attributing a narrative function...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sage
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Jahr: 2020, Band: 44, Heft: 4, Seiten: 733-756 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Kommentar
/ Erzählung
/ Niccacci, Alviero 1940-2018
/ Weinrich, Harald 1927-2022
/ Diskursanalyse
/ Textlinguistik
/ Polotsky, Hans Jakob 1905-1991
|
IxTheo Notationen: | HB Altes Testament |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Discourse Analysis
B Keywords Comment/narrative B Harald Weinrich B TEXT LINGUISTICS B Comment/narrative B foreground/background B zero-degree |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | Following my critique of Niccacci’s methodological stances, I establish a new interpretation of Biblical Hebrew word order derived from Harald Weinrich’s Tempus. Its word order mirrors the opposition between comment and narrative registers. I describe the reasons for attributing a narrative function to the wayyiqtol and wqatal (verb-first) sentences while reserving the comment function to xqatal, xyiqtol, and xparticiple (verb-second) sentences. The occasional occurrence of a comment sentence in indirect speech is, in most cases, the syntactic mark of the narrator’s addresses to the reader. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089219868655 |