Ego-Less Agency: Dharma-Responsiveness Without Kantian Autonomy
My critical focus in this article is on Rick Repetti's compatibilist conception of free will, and his apparent commitment to a Kantian conception of autonomy, which I argue is in direct conflict with the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. As an alternative, I defend a conception of ego-less agency t...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Review |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2020, Volume: 55, Numéro: 2, Pages: 497-518 |
| Compte rendu de: | Buddhism, meditation, and free will (Boca Raton, FL : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis,, 2018) (Cummiskey, David)
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion BL Bouddhisme NCB Éthique individuelle VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Free Will
B Buddhism B Agency B Compte-rendu de lecture B Kantian B Pudgalavadin B No-self B Moral Responsibility B Autonomy B Christine Korsgaard B reason-responsiveness |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | My critical focus in this article is on Rick Repetti's compatibilist conception of free will, and his apparent commitment to a Kantian conception of autonomy, which I argue is in direct conflict with the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. As an alternative, I defend a conception of ego-less agency that I believe better coheres with core Buddhist teachings. In the course of the argument, I discuss the competing conceptions of free agency and autonomy defended by Harry Frankfurt, John Martin Fischer, Christine Korsgaard, and David Velleman. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Référence: | Kommentar in "A Defense of Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2020)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12601 |