Flourishing Diversity: A Response to Markus Davidsen

The study of religion exceeds the boundaries of the comparative, or systematic, study of religion in a strict sense. Markus Davidsen considers this a problem. Scholars of religion should unite in order to prevent particularism and protect the discipline against postmodern tendencies. Therefore, a so...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Groot, C. N. de 1966- (Autore)
Altri autori: Davidsen, Markus Altena (Antecedente bibliografico)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Amsterdam University Press [2020]
In: NTT
Anno: 2020, Volume: 74, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 271-276
Notazioni IxTheo:AA Scienze religiose
AD Sociologia delle religioni
FB Formazione teologica universitaria
KBD Benelux
Altre parole chiave:B The Netherlands
B Sociology of Science
B Scientific Progress
B sociology of religion
B study of religion
Accesso online: Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:The study of religion exceeds the boundaries of the comparative, or systematic, study of religion in a strict sense. Markus Davidsen considers this a problem. Scholars of religion should unite in order to prevent particularism and protect the discipline against postmodern tendencies. Therefore, a solid foundation is needed. This response argues that in the contemporary context religion itself is dispersed. This situation may bring about the neglect of religion, but it also promotes the study of religion by researchers from various disciplines. This is not the problem that needs to be solved. Scientific progress is achieved by coherent and competing paradigms for research and education. It is this and the popularization of scientific knowledge that deserve our attention.
ISSN:2590-3268
Riferimento:Kritik von "Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited (2020)"
Kritik in "Fundamental Problems and Methods in the Study of Religion (2020)"
Comprende:Enthalten in: NTT
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.3.007.DEGR