Me, myself and the other. Interreligious and intrareligious relations in neo-conservative online forums

The Internet can be a place for exchange, but also foster echo chambers of closed world views. This poses interesting questions for the possibility of interreligious dialogue online. The article examines the cases of German Evangelical and Salafist Internet forums which mainly target a specific reli...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Elwert, Frederik (Auteur) ; Tabti, Samira (Auteur) ; Pfahler, Lukas (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge [2020]
Dans: Religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 50, Numéro: 3, Pages: 414-436
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Réseaux sociaux / Forum électronique / Mouvement évangélique / Ingroup / Salafiyya / Conservatisme / Dialogue interreligieux
Classifications IxTheo:AD Sociologie des religions
AX Dialogue interreligieux
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
KBB Espace germanophone
Sujets non-standardisés:B Salafism
B Islam
B Evangelicals
B neo-conservative religion
B Christianity
B Internet
B Interreligious Dialogue
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:The Internet can be a place for exchange, but also foster echo chambers of closed world views. This poses interesting questions for the possibility of interreligious dialogue online. The article examines the cases of German Evangelical and Salafist Internet forums which mainly target a specific religious denomination, but nevertheless provide spaces for contact between different religions and denominations. For the study, a combination of quantitative and qualitative text analysis is applied. Quantitative analysis makes it possible to gain an overview of the discussed themes from a large body of text and serves as a basis for sampling smaller textual units for close examination using qualitative content analysis. The analysis yields two primary results: First, intrareligious dialogue plays a particular role for the negotiation of religious identity. Second, interreligious relations reflect the societal positions of both religious groups.
ISSN:1096-1151
Contient:Enthalten in: Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2020.1754603