Romances of No-Popery: Transnational Anti-Catholicism in Giuseppe Garibaldi's The Rule of the Monk and Benjamin Disraeli's Lothair
Through an analysis of Conservative British politician Benjamin Disraeli's Lothair (1870) and Italian patriot Giuseppe Garibaldi's The Rule of the Monk (1870), this article highlights the connections between anti-Catholic literature and anti-Catholic politics in Victorian Britain and revea...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
The Catholic University of America Press
[2020]
|
| В: |
The catholic historical review
Год: 2020, Том: 106, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 399-420 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Disraeli, Benjamin 1804-1881, Lothair
/ Garibaldi, Giuseppe 1807-1882, Clelia
/ Großbritannien
/ Италия (мотив)
/ Рисорджименто (мотив)
/ Антикатолицизм
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | CD Христианство и культура CG Христианство и политика KAH Новое время KBF Британские острова KBJ Италия KDB Католическая церковь |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Literature
B Transnational B Anti-Catholicism B Italy B Britain |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Through an analysis of Conservative British politician Benjamin Disraeli's Lothair (1870) and Italian patriot Giuseppe Garibaldi's The Rule of the Monk (1870), this article highlights the connections between anti-Catholic literature and anti-Catholic politics in Victorian Britain and reveals how a diverse set of transnational actors simultaneously shaped and utilized British anti-Catholic discourses. It argues that not only did anti-Catholicism motivate British support for the Risorgimento, but the actors and events of the Risorgimento and the Papal response to it informed and reinforced popular anti-Catholic beliefs. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1534-0708 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: The catholic historical review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/cat.2020.0045 |