Prenatal Screening, Reproductive Choice, and Public Health

One widely held view of prenatal screening (PNS) is that its foremost aim is, or should be, to enable reproductive choice; this is the Pure Choice view. The article critiques this position by comparing it with an alternative: Public Health Pluralism. It is argued that there are good reasons to prefe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wilkinson, Stephen 1965- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell [2015]
En: Bioethics
Año: 2015, Volumen: 29, Número: 1, Páginas: 26-35
Clasificaciones IxTheo:NCC Ética social
NCH Ética de la medicina
Otras palabras clave:B Screening
B Reproduction
B Salud pública
B Consent
B prenatal
B Eugenics
B Autonomy
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descripción
Sumario:One widely held view of prenatal screening (PNS) is that its foremost aim is, or should be, to enable reproductive choice; this is the Pure Choice view. The article critiques this position by comparing it with an alternative: Public Health Pluralism. It is argued that there are good reasons to prefer the latter, including the following. (1) Public Health Pluralism does not, as is often supposed, render PNS more vulnerable to eugenics-objections. (2) The Pure Choice view, if followed through to its logical conclusions, may have unpalatable implications, such as extending choice well beyond health screening. (3) Any sensible version of Public Health Pluralism will be capable of taking on board the moral seriousness of abortion and will advocate, where practicable, alternative means of reducing the prevalence of disease and disability. (4) Public Health Pluralism is at least as well-equipped as the Pure Choice model to deal with autonomy and consent issues.
ISSN:1467-8519
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12121