Friend or Foe?: The Bishops of Metz in Monastic Historical Narrative, c. 1000–c. 1200
Monks writing at Saint-Clément, Metz, over roughly two hundred years produced conflicting images of Bishop Theodoric I (965-84). In earlier texts, he is the monks’ benefactor, in later sources, their foe. Historians have sought to flatten this contrast, partly because of their assumptions about mona...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
| В: |
The journal of ecclesiastical history
Год: 2020, Том: 71, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 253-269 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Theodoricus, Metensis -984
/ Kloster Sankt Clemens Metz
/ Реликвия
/ Историография
/ История (мотив) 970-1200
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | KAE Высокое средневековье KBG Франция KCA Монашество; религиозные ордена KCD Агиография RB Священнослужители |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Monks writing at Saint-Clément, Metz, over roughly two hundred years produced conflicting images of Bishop Theodoric I (965-84). In earlier texts, he is the monks’ benefactor, in later sources, their foe. Historians have sought to flatten this contrast, partly because of their assumptions about monastic reform. This paper offers an alternative reading that questions those assumptions. It suggests that the evolution of Theodoric's image reflects changing ideas about monastic reform and the proper relationship between bishops and monks. It also cautions against accepting narratives - medieval or modern - that obscure the fluidity of such ideas and relationships. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-7637 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0022046919001192 |