Zen og kunsten at spejlvende orientalisme
This article intends to put into perspective the critique on Orientalism raised by Edward Said with a case story (beyond Said's Orient) exemplifying how the Orientalist discourse has been inverted, serving as a means of religious and cultural identification. Focusing on the religious environmen...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Danois |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Univ.
[1998]
|
Dans: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Année: 1998, Volume: 32, Pages: 3-20 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Zen-buddhisme
B Orientalisme B Suzuki B D.T |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Résumé: | This article intends to put into perspective the critique on Orientalism raised by Edward Said with a case story (beyond Said's Orient) exemplifying how the Orientalist discourse has been inverted, serving as a means of religious and cultural identification. Focusing on the religious environment around the Japanese interpreter and poluparizer of Zen Buddhism., D. T. Suzuki, it is argued that a genealogical network of interrelated persons and a reciprocal exchange of ideas and representations, placed within certain historical contexts, made it possible for him to systematically invert those Orientalist ideas, turning them into new East-West dichotomies. It is argued that neither Suzuki-zen nor Orientalism nor inverted Orientalism must be ignored but recognized and contextualized in order to reconstruct Buddhist studies as a natural and important field within the comparative study of religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1904-8181 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7146/rt.v0i32.3847 |