Thinking with Foucault Beyond Christianity and the Secular: Notes on Religious Governmentality and Buddhist Monasticism
In Michel Foucault's original formulation of the concept, governmentality is intrinsically linked to religious practices and institutions. Although Christian practices associated with the pastorate and monasticism feature prominently as precursors of modern administration and statecraft in his...
| Другие заглавия: | Roundtable Discussion: Michel Foucault and Political Theology |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2021]
|
| В: |
Political theology
Год: 2021, Том: 22, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 60-67 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Governmentality
/ Christianity
/ Buddhism
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | BL Буддизм CG Христианство и политика KBM Азия VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Secular
B Buddhism B Monasticism B Comparison B Christianity B Governmentality B Foucault |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Итог: | In Michel Foucault's original formulation of the concept, governmentality is intrinsically linked to religious practices and institutions. Although Christian practices associated with the pastorate and monasticism feature prominently as precursors of modern administration and statecraft in his oeuvre, later works that employ the concept have overwhelmingly focused on the secular, and rational-scientific side of governmentality. This essay argues that by transposing governmentality to a non-European context, and by fleshing out a comparative perspectives beyond Christianity and the secular, it might be possible to recover some of the original religious implications of the concept. With reference to Theravāda Buddhism in Southeast Asia, the essay briefly discusses the potential role of monks and monasteries in establishing religious and monastic governmentality. Although there are obviously vast differences between Christianity and Buddhism, the essay concludes that exploring these ‘alternative governmentalities’ comparatively allows for novel interpretations beyond the secular religion divide and alleged Western rationality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2020.1866809 |