Sidonius Apollinaris "contra" Claudianus Mamertus: Jerome, Julianus Pomerius, and the Subversion of Praise
In the mid-to late fifth century a doctrinal controversy erupted in Gaul between the presbyter Claudianus Mamertus and Faustus, the bishop of Riez, regarding the corporeity of the soul. Sidonius Apollinaris, the bishop of Clermont, attempted to maintain his ties of friendship (amicitia) with both pa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
2021
|
| In: |
Journal of early Christian studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 215-235 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Sidonius, Gaius Sollius Apollinaris 431-487, Epistulae 4
/ Strategy
/ Rhetoric
/ Hieronymus, Sophronius Eusebius 345-420
/ Claudianus, Mamertus -474
/ Quarreling
/ Faustus, Reiensis 410-495
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In the mid-to late fifth century a doctrinal controversy erupted in Gaul between the presbyter Claudianus Mamertus and Faustus, the bishop of Riez, regarding the corporeity of the soul. Sidonius Apollinaris, the bishop of Clermont, attempted to maintain his ties of friendship (amicitia) with both parties, but ultimately Claudianus compelled him to acknowledge the publication of his polemical treatise, the De statu animae, which Sidonius had urged him to publish. This article argues that Sidonius's response to Claudianus (Ep. 4.3) alludes to Jerome's Ep. 58 to subvert his praise of Claudianus. Thus Sidonius's use of heavily stylized language and repetition invokes Jerome's criticism of the sincerity that such remarks convey. This subversion is signposted by Sidonius's emphasis of the compulsion he is under to respond in language stronger than merely required for this epistolary topos. A subsequent allusion by Julianus Pomerius to Sidonius's letter is used as evidence that this subversion was apparent to readers of Sidonius's reply to Claudianus. This literary strategy, whereby Claudianus was praised repeatedly in superficial terms, allowed Sidonius to defend his remarks to Faustus and his supporters, while still saving face with the Mamerti as the charge of excessive and insincere praise is hard to prove. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1086-3184 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of early Christian studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/earl.2021.0020 |