Research on a Buddha Mountain in Colonial-Period Korea: A Preliminary Discussion
Buddhist art became the focus of discussion when Japanese scholars began to construct Korean art history as an academic discipline. This paper presents a case study of how a particular Buddhist site, Mount Nam in Kyŏngju, was recognized, researched, and represented during the colonial period (1910-1...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
MDPI
2021
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Religions
Έτος: 2021, Τόμος: 12, Τεύχος: 7 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Ōsaka Kintaro
B colonial period B Buddhism B Kyŏngju B Oba Tsunekichi B Silla B Mount Nam B Government-General of Korea B Buddhist art |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή
|
| Σύνοψη: | Buddhist art became the focus of discussion when Japanese scholars began to construct Korean art history as an academic discipline. This paper presents a case study of how a particular Buddhist site, Mount Nam in Kyŏngju, was recognized, researched, and represented during the colonial period (1910-1945). By analyzing representative Japanese publications on the subject, I argue that there existed disconnection between the colonial government and the site-researchers. I re-evaluate the conventional narrative that the colonizers regarded Buddhist statues as “art” removed from their original religious setting. This paper reveals a more layered picture of the early years of historical discourse on the so-called Buddha Mountain and Buddhist sculptures of Korea. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel12070551 |