Überlegungen zu ausgewählten Aspekten der Behandlung des Jeremiabuchs in der Monographie von Benjamin Ziemer „Kritik des Wachstumsmodells“ (2020)

In a massive study, Benjamin Ziemer has launched a scathing stricture of redaction criticism in Old Testament studies. Based on comparative material from an impressive range of Ancient Near Eastern, biblical, early Jewish and early Christian literature, he maintains that diachronic research is unabl...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stipp, Hermann-Josef 1954- (Author)
Contributors: Ziemer, Benjamin (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill, Ferdinand Schöningh 2021
In: Biblische Zeitschrift
Year: 2021, Volume: 65, Issue: 2, Pages: 191-215
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Jeremia 36 / Textual criticism / Journalistic editing
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Further subjects:B Redaction Criticism
B Textual Criticism
B Book of Jeremiah
B Jeremiah 36
B pre-Masoretic idiolect
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In a massive study, Benjamin Ziemer has launched a scathing stricture of redaction criticism in Old Testament studies. Based on comparative material from an impressive range of Ancient Near Eastern, biblical, early Jewish and early Christian literature, he maintains that diachronic research is unable to deliver meaningful reconstructions that reach more than one stage of textual development behind the present biblical text. Moving beyond that boundary would amount to unfettered speculation. While his appraisal is overwhelmingly negative, there is one biblical book on which he endeavors to devise a redaction-critical hypothesis of his own: the book of Jeremiah. The article evaluates Ziemer’s theory on Jeremiah and draws some general conclusions regarding the validity of his verdict on traditional redaction-critical research.
ISSN:2589-0468
Reference:Kommentar zu "Kritik des Wachstumsmodells (Leiden : Brill, 2020)"
Kommentar zu "Kritik des Wachstumsmodells (Leiden : Brill, 2020)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Biblische Zeitschrift
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.30965/25890468-06502002