The Parable of the Good Samaritan: Two Theological Readings in the Victorian Church of England

Taking seriously the reality that theological interpretation of Scripture is not a monolithic enterprise but rather a varied discussion, this paper outlines two historical contributions to the theological reading of Scripture in the Victorian Church of England. By examining the way Richard Chenevix...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Hartin, Cole William (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2021
Dans: Horizons in biblical theology
Année: 2021, Volume: 43, Numéro: 2, Pages: 146-165
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Barmherziger Samariter / Exégèse / Keble, John 1792-1866 / Trench, Richard Chenevix 1807-1886
Classifications IxTheo:HC Nouveau Testament
Sujets non-standardisés:B Good Samaritan
B Theological Interpretation
B Victorian interpretation
B Providence
B John Keble
B Richard Chenevix Trench
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Taking seriously the reality that theological interpretation of Scripture is not a monolithic enterprise but rather a varied discussion, this paper outlines two historical contributions to the theological reading of Scripture in the Victorian Church of England. By examining the way Richard Chenevix Trench and John Keble interpret the parable of the good Samaritan, this essay shows that though both figures interpret Scripture in order to understand what it says about God, they diverge in their approach over questions of providence and ecclesial authority. The paper argues that for Trench, providence expands the scope of Scripture’s meaning but for Keble it leads to specific interpretive outcomes. Essentially, while Trench sees Scripture to be the product of divine providence, Keble sees providence to have shaped the consensus of the early Church.
ISSN:1871-2207
Contient:Enthalten in: Horizons in biblical theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18712207-12341430