Sola gratia: der Streit um die Gnade im 16. Jahrhundert, seine Auswirkungen für die Neuzeit und seine Virulenz in der Gegenwart

The "Common declaration about the theology of justification" from 1999 contains a "differentiated consensus". To understand the differences one must have recourse to the catholic position based on the thinking of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages as well as the protestant positi...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Ruhstorfer, Karlheinz 1963- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Echter 2004
In: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Year: 2004, 卷: 126, 發布: 3, Pages: 257-268
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 恩典論 / 爭論神學 / 歷史 1500-1600
B 稱義 / 天主教會 / 新教教會 / 普世教會合一
Further subjects:B 普世合一神學
B Molina,Luis
B redemption / grace
B Ecumenical Theology
B Thomas Aquinas
B Luther,Martin
B 恩典 / 救贖
B 證明正當 / 罪
B sin / justification
B Thomas von Aquin
B Kant,Immanuel
在線閱讀: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
實物特徵
總結:The "Common declaration about the theology of justification" from 1999 contains a "differentiated consensus". To understand the differences one must have recourse to the catholic position based on the thinking of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages as well as the protestant position grounded in modern thinking. The article exemplifies this hypothesis with an analysis of the relationship between grace and freedom in the thought of Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, Luis de Molina, and Immanuel Kant. Ecumenical progress depends to a great extent on the ability to relate medieval and modern thought.
Contains:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie