Der Geschichte im Konkreten begegnen: Antwortversuche von M. Blondel und E. Troeltsch
G. W. Leibniz develops the idea of the vinculum substantiale in order to be able to explain reality by creating unity between the monads by the substantial bond. For M. Blondel, human action is carried by love and the whole of reality is connected in it. With his historical method, E. Troeltsch atte...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electronic/Print Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Pontificia Univ. Gregoriana
2021
|
| Em: |
Gregorianum
Ano: 2021, Volume: 102, Número: 2, Páginas: 329-350 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | FA Teologia KAH Idade Moderna NBE Antropologia T História VA Filosofia |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | G. W. Leibniz develops the idea of the vinculum substantiale in order to be able to explain reality by creating unity between the monads by the substantial bond. For M. Blondel, human action is carried by love and the whole of reality is connected in it. With his historical method, E. Troeltsch attempts to explain the reality of history. Only in the knowledge of history the present can be understood. Blondel and Troeltsch capture reality because they do not separate transcendence and immanence. Man can grasp the meaning of reality if he acts in history and understands this action as the realization of the whole reality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0017-4114 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Gregorianum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.32060/gregorianum.102/1.2021.329-350 |