Beating around in the Bush: Methodological Directions for Australian Theology
The quest for an Australian theology has given rise to significant debate about methodology and the significance of the cultural context for any theological work. There are at least three different ways in which theology can attend to its context. Each of these gives rise to specific difficulties. A...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2002
|
| In: |
Pacifica
Year: 2002, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 266-293 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The quest for an Australian theology has given rise to significant debate about methodology and the significance of the cultural context for any theological work. There are at least three different ways in which theology can attend to its context. Each of these gives rise to specific difficulties. A recent debate between Tony Kelly and Geoffrey Lilburne suggests a stalemate about methodology. Central to each approach is a conviction about the nature and sources of our knowledge of God. A third approach is proposed, drawing upon Paul Tillich's “method of correlation” but developing a more conversational stance. In light of this method, a number of issues are proposed as the basis for future conversational reflections. Finally, a series of criteria are proposed for the critical appraisal of contextual conversational theologies. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1839-2598 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Pacifica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1030570X0201500302 |