Integrating Literacy and Science in Biology: Teaching and Learning Impacts of Reading Apprenticeship Professional Development

This study examined the effects of professional development integrating academic literacy and biology instruction on science teachers? instructional practices and students? achievement in science and literacy. The intervention consisted of 10 days of professional development in Reading Apprenticeshi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Greenleaf, Cynthia L. (VerfasserIn) ; Litman, Cindy (VerfasserIn) ; Hanson, Thomas L. (VerfasserIn) ; Rosen, Rachel (VerfasserIn) ; Boscardin, Christy K. (VerfasserIn) ; Herman, Joan (VerfasserIn) ; Schneider, Steven A. (VerfasserIn) ; Madden, Sarah (VerfasserIn) ; Jones, Barbara (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Sage 1998
In: Review and expositor
Jahr: 1998, Band: 95, Heft: 3, Seiten: 647-717
weitere Schlagwörter:B science literacy
B Professional Development
B Reading comprehension
B disciplinary literacy
B academic literacy
B STEM
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examined the effects of professional development integrating academic literacy and biology instruction on science teachers? instructional practices and students? achievement in science and literacy. The intervention consisted of 10 days of professional development in Reading Apprenticeship, an instructional framework integrating metacognitive inquiry routines into subject-area instruction to make explicit the tacit reasoning processes, problem-solving strategies, and textual features that shape literacy practices in academic disciplines. The study utilized a group-randomized, experimental design and multiple measures of teacher implementation and student learning and targeted groups historically unrepresented in the sciences. Hierarchical linear modeling procedures were used to estimate program impacts. Intervention teachers demonstrated increased support for science literacy learning and use of metacognitive inquiry routines, reading comprehension instruction, and collaborative learning structures compared to controls. Students in treatment classrooms performed better than controls on state standardized assessments in English language arts, reading comprehension, and biology.
ISSN:2052-9449
Enthält:Enthalten in: Review and expositor
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/003463739809500319