Public health, induced abortion, and spontaneous abortion

Bruce P. Blackshaw and Daniel Rodger contend that if we assume fetuses are persons, then abortion is a public health crisis that justifies overriding a gestational mother's rights and compelling her to carry the fetus to term, but dawdle addressing greater public health crises like spontaneous...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simkulet, William (Author)
Contributors: Blackshaw, Bruce (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2021
In: Bioethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 35, Issue: 9, Pages: 910-915
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCB Personal ethics
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B public health crisis
B harm principle
B inconsistency arguments
B Abortion
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Bruce P. Blackshaw and Daniel Rodger contend that if we assume fetuses are persons, then abortion is a public health crisis that justifies overriding a gestational mother's rights and compelling her to carry the fetus to term, but dawdle addressing greater public health crises like spontaneous abortion and hunger. They draw a distinction between deliberate and indeliberate harm to justify restricting rights in the former, but not the latter; but such distinction fails to justify restricting rights in most public health crises. Furthermore, it fails to justify curtailing abortion rights as unwilling gestational mothers might deliberately induce abortion in self-defense, merely indeliberately harming the fetus.
ISSN:1467-8519
Reference:Kritik von "If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis (2021)"
Kommentar in "Public health ethics and abortion: A response to Simkulet (2022)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12944