In Defence of the Laws of War

This essay warns that Nigel Biggar’s permissive reading of the classic, theological just war tradition is problematic especially when combined with his highly contextual approach to the United Nations Charter and laws of war. Two points are made: (1) When compared to Augustine’s grappling with the d...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reed, Esther D. 1965- (Author)
Contributors: Biggar, Nigel 1955- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2015
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 298-304
Review of:In defence of war (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press, 2013) (Reed, Esther D.)
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NCD Political ethics
Further subjects:B Augustine
B International Law
B Book review
B Love
B Politics
B Just War
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This essay warns that Nigel Biggar’s permissive reading of the classic, theological just war tradition is problematic especially when combined with his highly contextual approach to the United Nations Charter and laws of war. Two points are made: (1) When compared to Augustine’s grappling with the disordered loves of the Roman empire—including ‘foreign iniquity’ as an excuse for military action, the animus dominandi, and wars of a kind that generate more war—In Defence of War lacks a political realism robust enough to defend against leaving the laws of war in the hands of the most powerful nations. (2) When compared to Augustine’s engagement with why and how secular law must constitute the conditions for peaceable and ordered co-existence, In Defence of War fails to incorporate into its just war reasoning a defence of the legal regime necessary for the protection of international peace and security.
ISSN:0953-9468
Reference:Kritik in "In Response (2015)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0953946814565314