Reading Mill and Forster in Church: Liberal and Hauerwasian Ethics in Conversation

Throughout his theological career Stanley Hauerwas has struggled to maintain a demarcation between liberal and Christian ethics. Is such a separation theologically defensible? In an effort to deconstruct Hauerwas’s hostility to liberalism through Hauerwasian categories, the following article examine...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Wood, Benjamin J. (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Sage 2015
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2015, 卷: 28, 发布: 4, Pages: 478-490
IxTheo Classification:KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NCA Ethics
Further subjects:B Church
B Mill
B Hauerwas
B public virtue
B Forster
B Liberalism
在线阅读: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:电子
实物特征
总结:Throughout his theological career Stanley Hauerwas has struggled to maintain a demarcation between liberal and Christian ethics. Is such a separation theologically defensible? In an effort to deconstruct Hauerwas’s hostility to liberalism through Hauerwasian categories, the following article examines areas of resemblance between liberal and Hauerwasian ethics. Through a comparative reading of the liberalisms of J. S. Mill (1806–1873) and E. M. Forster (1879–1970), the following argument retrieves a neglected form of liberal politics which in many respects conforms to the structure of Hauerwas’s radical description of Christian discipleship. Instead of understanding the Church as an isolated colony embattled against non-Christian culture, Mill and Forster challenge Hauerwas to consider the liberal polity as both the child and responsibility of the Church.
ISSN:0953-9468
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0953946815585081