Prophetic Conflict in Israelite History: Taking Sides With William G. Dever
William Dever's claim that my paper is outdated, incompetent and treats archae ological data cavalierly is based on a strategy of misrepresentation and misunder standing. The polarization of the debate into competing camps is misleading in terms of the views of the different scholars who are di...
| Published in: | Journal for the study of the Old Testament |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
1996
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | William Dever's claim that my paper is outdated, incompetent and treats archae ological data cavalierly is based on a strategy of misrepresentation and misunder standing. The polarization of the debate into competing camps is misleading in terms of the views of the different scholars who are discussed. The rhetoric of his claim to be fostering inter-disciplinary dialogue is not borne out by the tone and arguments of his rejoinder. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/030908929602107202 |