Prophetic Conflict in Israelite History: Taking Sides With William G. Dever
William Dever's claim that my paper is outdated, incompetent and treats archae ological data cavalierly is based on a strategy of misrepresentation and misunder standing. The polarization of the debate into competing camps is misleading in terms of the views of the different scholars who are di...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Sage
1996
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Έτος: 1996, Τόμος: 21, Τεύχος: 72, Σελίδες: 25-44 |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Μη ηλεκτρονικά
|
| Σύνοψη: | William Dever's claim that my paper is outdated, incompetent and treats archae ological data cavalierly is based on a strategy of misrepresentation and misunder standing. The polarization of the debate into competing camps is misleading in terms of the views of the different scholars who are discussed. The rhetoric of his claim to be fostering inter-disciplinary dialogue is not borne out by the tone and arguments of his rejoinder. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/030908929602107202 |