Removing Ruth: Tiqqune Sopherim in Ruth 3.3-4?

Commentators on Ruth 3.3-4 often pause to note the kethib—qere found in these verses, explaining the unusual form of the kethibs ‭יחדריו‬ and ‭יחבכשו‬ as archaic second feminine singular perfects. This article suggests that the kethib forms found in Ruth 3.3-4 are not archaic, but are the result of...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Irwin, Brian P. (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Sage 2008
Em: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Ano: 2008, Volume: 32, Número: 3, Páginas: 331-338
Outras palavras-chave:B kethib—qere
B Naomi
B Ruth
B threshing floor
B Sex in the Bible
B scribal emendation
B Boaz
B tiqqune sopherim
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Commentators on Ruth 3.3-4 often pause to note the kethib—qere found in these verses, explaining the unusual form of the kethibs ‭יחדריו‬ and ‭יחבכשו‬ as archaic second feminine singular perfects. This article suggests that the kethib forms found in Ruth 3.3-4 are not archaic, but are the result of an intentional emendation of the text by a scribe intent on reconciling the passage with the teaching of the Torah. The effect of this change is to remove Ruth from any possible intimate encounter with Boaz and replace her with Naomi. Thus, these two readings should be considered as an unrecognized occurrence of tiqqune sopherim.
ISSN:1476-6728
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0309089208090804