Inventing the Apocrypha: The Role of Early Latin Canon Lists
The Western churches have long had disagreements as to what books form the `canon' of the Old Testament, and, therefore, which books can be used in theological argument. This article argues that this dispute is itself a function of earlier disputes in the late patristic and early medieval perio...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sage
2009
|
| Dans: |
Irish theological quarterly
Année: 2009, Volume: 74, Numéro: 1, Pages: 53-74 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Augustine
B deuterocanon B Apocrypha B Jerome B Biblical Canon |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | The Western churches have long had disagreements as to what books form the `canon' of the Old Testament, and, therefore, which books can be used in theological argument. This article argues that this dispute is itself a function of earlier disputes in the late patristic and early medieval periods, and explores how the solution to those disputes left a legacy of confusion that fuelled the Reformation and later debates. This exploration is focused on the canon listings that were produced as part of the patristic and early medieval debates. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-4989 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Irish theological quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0021140008098844 |