A Response to Kevin Duffy on von Balthasar and the Immutability of God
Kevin Duffy has argued that von Balthasar’s attempt to combine analogy and metaphor in speaking about change and suffering in God results, in a classical context, in incoherence. Has Duffy given sufficient attention to von Balthasar’s trinitarian ontology of love and to the possibility that the clas...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2013
|
| In: |
Irish theological quarterly
Year: 2013, Volume: 78, Issue: 2, Pages: 179-184 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ontology
B Love B Analogy B Metaphor |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Kevin Duffy has argued that von Balthasar’s attempt to combine analogy and metaphor in speaking about change and suffering in God results, in a classical context, in incoherence. Has Duffy given sufficient attention to von Balthasar’s trinitarian ontology of love and to the possibility that the classical framework itself may need some stretching? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-4989 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Irish theological quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0021140012472636 |