Informal Coercion in the Physical Care of Patients Suffering from Senile Dementia or Mental Retardation

This article discusses under what circumstances patients who are suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation should be submitted to coercive care, who should decide about this kind of coercion, and in what legal framework it should take place. A distinction is drawn between modest (i.e. of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tännsjö, Torbjörn (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 1999
In: Nursing ethics
Year: 1999, Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 327-336
Further subjects:B Mental Retardation
B meddlesome coercion
B modest coercion
B Coercion
B Senile dementia
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article discusses under what circumstances patients who are suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation should be submitted to coercive care, who should decide about this kind of coercion, and in what legal framework it should take place. A distinction is drawn between modest (i.e. of moderate degree) and meddlesome coercion. The use of modest coercion is defended. It is argued that medical personnel ought to decide exclusively about the use of modest coercion. However, no law should render legitimate the use of even modest coercion. It is conceded that to prohibit the use of a kind of coercion that is expected to take place is hypocrisy. It is argued that this is, however, an acceptable form of hypocrisy.
ISSN:1477-0989
Contains:Enthalten in: Nursing ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/096973309900600408